New Jersey Bill Seeks To Ban Trapping

New Jersey Senate Bill 179, sponsored by Sen. Vin Gopal (D-11), would ban the manufacturing, sale, possession, importation, transportation or use of a spring-loaded foothold or body-gripping trap. Effectively, making it illegal to trap by traditional methods in the state. The bill has been assigned to the Senate Environment and Energy Committee where it is waiting to receive testimony. More Information

CWCOA 14th Annual Conference Summary & Review

Our 14th annual CWCOA Conference, February 9, 2018, in Denver, was a blockbuster! We had a great line-up of speakers, topics and representation from multiple government agencies. 2018’s keynote speaker, Stephen Vantassel, NWCOA Western Director, owner of Wildlife Control Consultant, LLC and Vertebrate Pest Specialist for the Montana Dept. of Agriculture, gave a great keynote address “What’s happening? – The Industry, NWCOA and the Future” which was well received by attendees. Stephen gives a no-nonsense, truthful assessment of where we are, where we are heading as an industry and talked openly about sensitive issues facing our industry.

Gary McElroy (Colorado Dept. of Ag – CDA) gave a presentation on Laws & Regs “CDA Update” and CEC’s (2 – Laws & Regs) were provided.

Martin Lowney (State Director USDA Wildlife Services – APHIS) gave very helpful and valuable information on how his agency helped to assist through research and fact-based use of various traps and devices that were affected by Chapter 14 Amendment and how their science-based / fact-based research supports their use as effective methods of capture and control and how this research contributed to authorizations by the CPW for their use given special circumstances (to be later discussed by Dan Gates).

Stephen Vantassel gave a presentation on “Euthanasia – The Good, The Bad & The Ugly” worth 1 CEC (Applicator Safety)

Crystal Chick (CPW Denver Area Wildlife Manager / New Liason for CWCOA) along with Dan Gates (Colorado Rid-A-Critter / President of CTPHA Colorado Trappers, Predators, Hunters Assoc) gave a presentation on “CPW Update & W-17 Trapping Regulation Revisions”. The efforts of Dan Gates as well as Martin Lowney and the CPW have resulted in expended use of additional control devices in special situations, through a permitting process. It is quite evident that the efforts spent on this collaboration have resulted in tools that can be utilized that were not known to be available to use by our industry post Amendment 14. This effort and cooperation by these folks are a huge benefit to our industry. We would like to thank these individuals involved for their time, efforts and energy spent making these changes possible and the process understood and documented.

Dr. Jennifer House, State Public Health Veterinarian DVM, MPH, DACVPM as well as Dr. Natalie Marzec, MPH Zoonosis. Epidemiologist along with Tracy Woodall from the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment gave an excellent presentation “The Latest on Colorado Zoonotic Diseases” worth 1 CEC (Use of Pesticides). They gave very pertinent and important information on zoonotic disease potential, safety measures, and resources on dealing with public health issues.

Rachel Mulder, Executive Office Manager (Whitmore Pest & Wildlife Control) gave a great presentation on “In With The New – Going Paperless). This presentation focused on our ever-changing technological world and how companies can become more efficient through technological advances in data management.

Stephen Vantassel gave another presentation on “Field Fumigation for Management of Vertebrate Pests” worth another 1 CEC (Use of Pesticides)

Our conference offered a total of 5 CEC’s applicable to the Colorado Department of Agriculture Pesticide Training Requirements.

Food and beverage selections were excellent, and attendees had a great opportunity for networking and building relationships with other key players in our industry.

Learn Interesting Facts About Voles in Denver, CO (and How You Can Protect Your Lawn Against Vole Damage)

Now is the time to start protecting your lawn so that it can be lush and full of life this Spring. You may have noticed some unsightly tracks running through your grass after the last major snow storm… Or maybe your evergreen shrubs appear to be dying for no apparent reason. This could mean that you have voles living on your property and feeding on your foliage.

Here are a few fun facts about voles in Colorado:

  • There are 8 different types of voles in Colorado.
  • The height of breeding occurs Spring-Fall.
  • Voles can have up to 12 litters per year and most litters produce 3-6 young.
  • Reproduction typically begins at 3 weeks of age and gestation ranges from 20-23 days.
  • Vole populations may range from 14-500 voles per acre.

Many homeowners mistakenly believe that voles are not active during the winter months. However, snow cover provides excellent protection from predators and voles are able to travel underneath of the snow unscathed. Since other food sources are scarce during the winter months, voles will harm trees and bushes by girdling the roots and bark. They can also create deep veins and runways in the grass – leaving beautifully landscaped lawns in ruins.

Here are a few things you can do to help limit vole populations on your property:

  • Keep your grass trimmed short during the spring and summer months to limit voles access to cover from predators.
  • Avoid planting evergreen shrubs such as junipers and/or remove them from your property.
  • Attempt to keep bird seed from falling on the ground and providing a food source (especially during the fall and winter months)
  • Clean up any fallen fruits or vegetables from fruit trees and garden areas regularly.

Professional pest control assistance may be needed to maintain vole populations. In most situation, the goal will be to control the vole population so that damage does not occur to your landscaped areas. It is rarely possible to completely eradicate an entire vole population (especially if your property borders open space, fields, or the whole neighborhood has activity) It is also important to remember that rodent populations can move (front to back yard etc) or fluctuate.

Article Provided By Wilson Christner at Whitmore Pest & Wildlife Control, Inc.

Keep Squirrels Out of Your Denver, CO Attic (and What to Do if They Are Already Inside)

It’s that time of year again… The leaves have already changed and begun to fall. With the warmer days of summer behind us, bushy-tailed friends may seek out your attic for a cozy winter home.

Tree squirrels with their agility and aptitude for climbing are the most likely to enter your attic space. Grounds squirrels or chipmunks may climb up and enter, but it is less likely. Since squirrels are diurnal, most activity in the attic space occurs during the morning hours following sunrise and the evening hours around sunset. Scratching chewing or scampering noises may alert you to the unwanted presence.

Here are a few tips to help prevent squirrel intrusions:

  1. Keep foliage trimmed on the exterior perimeter of your home and avoid letting vines climb up the side of your home.
  2. Avoid stacking objects (such as firewood) directly against the structure of your home or garage.
  3. Keep tree branches trimmed away from the roof line of your home.
  4. Repair hail or water damaged boards promptly.
  5. If your roof has been replaced, have a pest control professional inspect the flashing and vent work for animal concerns.

If squirrels do enter your attic space,  they may cause damage by chewing wiring or other items stored in your attic. Running and nesting inside the attic space may compress the insulation causing it to lose R-Value. Squirrels may also tear or shred batted insulation to use as nesting material. This can leave an area of your attic without insulation. In additional, squirrels can carry several disease and transmit others indirectly. Visit www.cdc.gov to learn more about the diseases transmitted by squirrels.

To gain access into your attic space, squirrels may take advantage of water damaged wood along roof lines and soffits. Areas where two roof lines intersect are especially vulnerable. They are also know to enter through roof vents or damaged gable vents. In some situations, they even create access points underneath of clay tiles. The pictures below depict squirrel damage to a tile roof (picture 1), a squirrel entry point in a soffit (picture 2) and wiring damaged by squirrels (picture 3).

A hole in roof that was chewed by a squirrel
A hole in soffit that was chewed by a squirrel.
An attic electrical wire that was chewed by a squirrel

Wildlife professionals can assist in the removal and repair process. They can identify the squirrel’s access points, remove the squirrels and offer services to repair the damage. Most squirrel removal/repair projects can be complete in as little as 1-2 weeks.

Here are a few questions to ask the wildlife professional that you contact:

  1. What type of material is used in the repair? (Spray foam or other chew-able materials are not advised)
  2. Can you restore my insulation and attic damage?
  3. Will you check for other vulnerable areas along the exterior of my home?

Article Provided By Wilson Christner at Whitmore Pest & Wildlife Control, Inc.

US and Colorado Well Represented

We had government representation from the US Fish & Wildlife Service, Colorado Dept. of Parks & Wildlife, Colorado Department of Agriculture and the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment. The CPW sent 6 personnel to attend! This cooperation with government officials is an excellent sign of the hard work that has gone into fostering these relationships. These speakers and attendees enhance our membership through this excellent training and networking opportunity. The CWCOA board looks forward to the continued cooperation and relationship building with government agencies and personnel to advance our industry and protect our interests in pest and wildlife control operations.

Crystal Chick, AWM, is now our official liaison person for the CPW

The year’s conference was a great opportunity for training, networking and fulfilling your need to have CEC credits through the Colorado Dept of Ag. If you weren’t there, you missed a great event! Our next conference is being planned to be another winner.  We are planning on again offering another NWCOA Certified Training Opportunity. Please submit suggestions on the conference improvements and training you might be interested in seeing. We’ll keep you informed.

If you are not already a member of the CWCOA, please consider becoming one! The benefits are numerous and we hope we can count on you to help us to grow strong. This will help us to continue to provide excellent training opportunities, advocate for wildlife control industry issues and protect our industry tools and control options!                                                                   –

Gerrod Walker
CWCOA Member

The Rest of the Story Part 2

(Vol 2, Art 2, April, 2013)

Coyotes are incredibly adaptable and resilient.  They have expanded their range/distribution from the central plains and southwest deserts of North America in pre-colonial times to all 48 contiguous states and from the northern tip of Alaska to the isthmus of Panama.  They are now found in almost all habitats, including downtown major metropolitan areas (e.g., LA, Phoenix, Denver and Chicago).  Recent DNA evidence indicates coyotes migrated eastward via two main routes, a northern one through the Great Lakes region, where some hybridization with wolves occurred, and a southern route likely supplemented by human introductions.  The two routes merge generally in Virginia.

A key to coyote adaptability and survival is their instinct or drive to exploit whatever environment they’re in to whatever level of dominance that circumstances/constraints allow.  Another is their ability to be opportunistic generalists in diet.  They can survive on as little as fresh cow manure, juniper berries or urban road kill.  One coyote advocate in Denver describes them as the “ultimate flexitarian.”

Coyote abundance (i.e., density) in a given area (i.e., carrying capacity) is determined primarily by availability of food, followed by social dominance and territoriality.  In historic western range densities are often less than 1 coyote/sq mi, although 2/sq mi is not uncommon.  Some areas of Texas have densities as high as 5 or more/sq mi.  Interestingly, some of the highest recorded densities are in urban areas like southern California and Chicago!  Similarly, annual survival rates in urban areas are quite high (LA = 74%, Chicago = 62%) compared to rural Colorado (roughly 38%).

In a given population, typically the majority (60-90%) of adult females breed.  The percentage of yearling females that breed varies with the level of winter food supply and the population level relevant to carrying capacity.  Similarly, litter size varies with population density and available winter food.  Litter size is typically 4-7, depending on population density, with 6 being about average.

Exploited populations (those impacted by hunting, trapping and predator control) certainly can exhibit a “rebound effect” when reduced below carrying capacity.  Typically there will be increases in the number of breeding yearlings, litter size, survival rate of pups and rate of immigration.  Those opposed to coyote control almost always argue this tendency, even claiming that killing coyotes actually results in increased coyote numbers, i.e., the more you kill, the more you get.

Theoretically this rebound effect could elevate total coyote numbers briefly at post-whelping, but ultimately it’s an oxymoron because abundance is primarily determined by food availability.  In addition, the overall population would be very young and mortality would be very high.  Furthermore, this argument cuts both ways.  It suggests that hunting/trapping are actually beneficial to coyote populations.

Coyotes generally give birth in April.  Pup eyes open at about two weeks.  Young begin emerging from the den around 3 weeks and are usually weaned at 5-7 weeks.  Typically 70–75% of coyote populations are 1-4 years old.  Studies indicate that 60-75% of coyotes don’t survive past their first year.  Coyotes 2-3 years old have the highest survival rates.  Those in the 4-8 year old range are fairly common.  However only a few make it past 11 years in the wild.  A few in the 13-15 year range have been documented.  Humans, by far, are the greatest cause of mortality.
Depending on population dynamics, 15-50% of a given population are solitary or transitory individuals.  The rest being alpha pairs or family groups (i.e., packs).  Several studies indicate coyotes disperse a mean distance of around 18 miles.

Several diseases can seriously impact coyote populations, including parvovirus, distemper and sarcoptic mange.  Pups are most vulnerable, whereas older, surviving adults develop antibodies against parvo and distemper.  Mange is currently rampant in many western coyote populations.

Recent research has turned up a few other interesting observations.  One is that coyotes tend to hunt first with their eyes (vision), then ears (audition), and lastly nose (olfaction).  See any application for callers?  Trappers?

Coyotes are sure interesting!

Article Provided By Claude Oleyar at Alpine Animal Control

The Life of Coyotes

(Vol 2, Art 1, April, 2013)

The life of a coyote over the course of a year can be separated roughly into four phases or seasons:  1) courting/breeding:  predominantly January – February; 2) gestation/whelping:   March – April (generally 63 days); 3) pup rearing:  May – August; 4) dispersal:  September – December.  By December most pups of the year have reached adult size and weight although some won’t reach peak size for two years or more.

Coyotes are quite social and have a fairly well-defined social structure.  They are somewhat less social than wolves in some ways, but more so than more solitary red and grey foxes.  Ultimately there are four social categories:  resident alpha (or territorial) pairs, resident packs, solitary (non-territorial) individuals, and large feeding groups (or aggregations).  Resident pairs are alpha or dominant adults.  Resident natal packs include an alpha pair, betas (adults and yearlings subordinate to alphas), and pups (young of the year).  Solitary individuals can be variously described as transients, nomads or “unaffiliateds.”  Aggregations of seven or more coyotes can be a combination of all of the above and are generally temporary congregations around a large biomass food source.  The food source is usually in the form of ungulate (hoofed animal) carrion (e.g., a fresh deer or cow carcass), but can be concentrations of live prey such as winter herds of deer or antelope.

Except for these large feeding aggregations, resident pairs and packs actively defend well-defined territories against other coyotes.  They do so directly with aggressive chasing and fighting and indirectly by scent marking and vocalizing.  Scent marking in the form of urine and feces, sometimes coupled with “scratch-backs,” is common along territorial borders.  Scent marking and scratch-backs by males peak prior to and at the onset of breeding (January – February).  Scent marking by females increases in association with whelping and pup rearing (April- May).  Territoriality is most defined from mating through pup rearing (February – August).  It can wane during other times of the year.  Some researchers describe territories as a “land-tenure system,” meaning specific territories can be maintained over several years or even several generations.

Solitary coyotes without territories tend to have larger, more loosely defined home ranges that may overlap or skirt territories of other coyotes.  These transients or nomads tend to be dispersing pups (yearlings) or lower-ranking beta adults.  They are often looking to rejoin their natal group, join other groups (packs), or create their own territories.

Almost from birth aggressive-passive interaction between coyotes begins to establish dominance or pecking order that carries over to adult life, ultimately separating alphas from betas and prompting dispersal.  Some would suggest that all coyote interactions, including vocalizations, are simply expressions of where an individual is found on the aggressive-passive (or dominant-submissive) scale.  Within natal packs and even feeding aggregations there is a definite pecking order of who eats first, most, or not at all.

Not a lot is known about coyote energy and water requirements.  We do know that coyote diet varies seasonally largely based on availability of food sources.  In winter, ungulate prey and carrion, plus rabbits and voles, are significant food sources.  Road killed mammals are a big

source in more suburban/urban areas.  At least one study indicated coyotes need on average roughly 1.3 pounds of meat per day.  There are indications that coyotes tend to rest more and hunt less in winter, especially when carrion in available, likely as an energy conservation measure.  However, it is common knowledge among hunters and trappers that coyote activity peaks immediately prior to and after winter storms.  Water needs are even less known, but we know coyotes can thrive in rather arid conditions.  Apparently they can get a lot of mileage from dew/frost, snow and moisture within fresh prey.  Generally, coyotes live in summer where they can survive in winter.

Courting and pairing can start as early as December.  Mating can occur from late January to early March, but seems to peak mid to late February in many areas.  Strong pair bonds can and do exist, but not always.  Some coyotes stay paired for many years.  But, bonds can be broken by injury, disease or death, or by changes in alpha-beta dominance.  Also, it’s not unusual to observe a female in heat being pursued closely by three to even eight or more males, with the female mating with multiple males in rapid succession.  Apparently, the female decides who will be her ultimate mate.

Such is the life of a coyote in winter.

Article Provided By Claude Oleyar at Alpine Animal Control